A scoping review analyzes numerical modeling of third-window syndromes, suggesting implications for diagnosis and treatment.
Introduction: Third-window syndromes (TWS), including superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) and enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), cause paradoxical auditory and vestibular symptoms such as apparent conductive loss, bone-conduction hyperacusis, and sound- or pressure-induced vertigo. Numerical modeling provides a unique means to explore the mechanical consequences of lesion size, geometry, and location. Methods: A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (July 2025) identified nine studies applying lumped-element, finite-element (FE), or computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models to SSCD or EVA, which were analyzed qualitatively. Results: Lumped-element models reproduced air–bone gaps and bone-conduction hypersensitivity, showing that lesion size and location modulate functional severity. FE and CFD simulations offered anatomically detailed insights, revealing that dehiscence geometry strongly shapes basilar membrane motion, that sound-induced endolymphatic streaming can account for the Tullio phenomenon, and that large vestibular aqueducts transmit intracranial pressure fluctuations. Validation across studies remained limited. Conclusion: Numerical models provide complementary insights into TWS. Lumped-element approaches are rapid and clinically interpretable, while FE and CFD enable detailed exploration of fluid–structure interactions. Patient-specific simulations may eventually support individualized diagnosis and surgical planning but remain speculative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gargula et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: