Development and validation of the gynecologic examination anxiety scale ( GEAS ): A 20‐item patient‐reported measure

Hacer Demirtop; Kerime Derya Beydağ; Aysu Yıldız Karaahmet

doi:10.1002/ijgo.71014

April 20, 2026International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsOpen Access

Development and validation of the gynecologic examination anxiety scale ( GEAS ): A 20‐item patient‐reported measure

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The main goal was to create and validate a scale that measures anxiety associated with gynecologic examinations.
Developed a 20-item scale based on patient feedback and clinical insights.
Conducted validation testing to assess reliability and accuracy of the scale.
Applied in clinical settings to improve anxiety management during gynecologic exams.
The GEAS demonstrated high reliability, indicating it is a trustworthy measurement tool.
Validated for use in clinical settings for anxiety assessment.
Found to be effective in tailoring trauma-informed care strategies.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Validation research develops a gynecologic examination anxiety scale for improved patient care, indicating its utility in clinical settings.

Abstract

The GEAS is a brief, valid, and reliable instrument that captures anxiety specific to gynecologic examination and is suitable for clinic-level screening/triage, tailoring of trauma-informed care, and quality-improvement efforts.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Demirtop et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865d76e0dea528ddea5b4 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71014

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Development and validation of the gynecologic examination anxiety scale ( GEAS ): A 20‐item patient‐reported measure

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Development and validation of the gynecologic examination anxiety scale ( GEAS ): A 20‐item patient‐reported measure

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading