Field experiment reveals reduced educational program participation due to identity disclosure among students, indicating communication impacts.
I investigate the unintended effects of publicly informing individuals that their selection for a beneficial opportunity, an international training programme, is based on their group identity. In a natural field experiment with a Colombian university, I target 4, 831 students and disclose to some that selection is based on demographics. Public identity disclosure reduced take-up by 27% and completion by 20% relative to a condition in which eligibility criteria were concealed. Three complementary online experiments with 1, 113 students suggest that identity-based selection raises image concerns, which discourage programme participation. The results highlight that the way institutions communicate beneficial opportunities can itself become a barrier to take-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manuel Muñoz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: