PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence and Leadership in Organizations: A PRISMA Systematic Review of Challenges, Risks, and Governance Dynamics

View Full Paper
CSCarlos Santiago-TornerJCJosé-Antonio Corral-MarfilETElisenda Tarrats-Pons

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how artificial intelligence influences leadership effectiveness in organizations through a systematic review.
  • Conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of 33 peer-reviewed articles.
  • Analyzed the literature concerning AI integration, leadership capabilities, and governance structures.
  • Synthesized findings across strategic, human, and governance domains.
  • Identified patterns indicating that effective AI leadership relies on alignment between AI integration and leadership capabilities.
  • Highlighted the importance of governance mechanisms in ensuring transparency and accountability.
  • Noted that opportunities associated with AI are less systematically developed compared to challenges and risks.

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in organizational processes, questions about its implications for leadership have gained growing relevance. However, the existing literature remains fragmented, often addressing strategy, leadership capabilities, governance structures, or ethical concerns in isolation, without explaining how these dimensions interact to shape leadership effectiveness in AI-driven environments. This study conducts a PRISMA-guided systematic review of 33 peer-reviewed articles to examine how AI-embedded leadership is conceptualized across contexts. By synthesizing findings across strategic, human, and governance domains, the analysis identifies recurring patterns and structural relationships in the literature. The results indicate that effective leadership in AI-intensive settings is not determined solely by technological adoption or digital competencies, but by the alignment between the depth of AI integration in decision-making processes, leaders’ capacity to interpret and oversee algorithmic outputs, and the presence of governance mechanisms that ensure transparency, accountability, and trust. While some studies highlight potential opportunities associated with AI, these remain less systematically developed compared to the extensive focus on challenges and emerging risks. On this basis, the study introduces the AI-Leadership Configurational Framework (ALCF), a multi-level model that conceptualizes leadership effectiveness as the outcome of systemic alignment. The framework integrates previously disconnected debates and provides a coherent foundation for future empirical research on leadership in the algorithmic age.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santiago-Torner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865fd6e0dea528ddea740https://doi.org/10.3390/su18084085
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AI and organizational leadership: bibliometric review and future trends2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2AI-Driven Leadership: Decision-Making, Competencies, and Ethical Challenges—A Systematic Review2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Leadership in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategic Transformation2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Leadership governance under algorithmic mediation: reconceptualizing transformative leadership through an integrative review2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Leadership training and development in the age of artificial intelligence2024 · 79 citations