Develops a resource-efficient AI system to translate echocardiography reports, improving access for non-specialists.
Background/Objectives: Echocardiography reports are essential diagnostic tools, but their complexity and specialized English terminology frequently hinder comprehension for non-specialists and patients. This study addresses these accessibility gaps by developing a resource-efficient large language model (LLM) system designed to translate and summarize English echocardiography results into Traditional Chinese. Methods: To overcome significant hardware constraints, we utilized Quantized Low-Rank Adapter (QLoRA) techniques and the Unsloth acceleration framework to fine-tune LLaMA-3.2-1B and LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instruct models on a single mid-tier GPU. The system employs a dual-stage inference architecture: the first stage provides technical medical translation for clinicians, while the second stage generates simplified, patient-centric educational summaries to enhance health literacy. Results: Evaluation across multiple metrics, including BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, and Perplexity, demonstrated that the LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instruct model with the AdamW 8-bit optimizer achieved the most stable validation performance, excelling in semantic coherence and structural consistency. A preliminary qualitative error analysis conducted in the Discussion section further identified clinical nuances, such as terminology simplification and minor hallucinations, underscoring the critical necessity of a Human-in-the-Loop verification procedure. Conclusions: These findings validate the feasibility of deploying cutting-edge medical AI in resource-limited clinical environments. While the results reflect validation-only performance on a specialized dataset, the platform offers a scalable foundation for enhancing clinical decision support and health literacy through accessible, automated medical text processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: