PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science2 citationsOpen Access

Impact of weak generalized synchronization on time series forecasting using reservoir computers

View Full Paper
HSHiromichi SuetaniUPUlrich Parlitz

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how generalized synchronization affects chaotic time series forecasting using echo state networks.
  • Analyzed the relationship between forecasting performance and dynamical properties of echo state networks.
  • Investigated generalized synchronization using conditional Lyapunov exponents and a replica synchronization error method.
  • Distinguished between strong and weak generalized synchronization effects on forecasting performance.
  • Optimal forecasting occurs just before the breakdown of strong generalized synchronization under noise-free conditions.
  • In noisy conditions, the best forecasting point shifts towards reduced transversal contraction during bubbling dynamics.
  • Performance degrades significantly when bubbling becomes dominant, despite generalized synchronization remaining intact.

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between the performance of chaotic time series forecasting and the dynamical properties of echo state networks (ESNs) from the viewpoint of generalized synchronization (GS). By treating the ESN as a response system driven by chaotic input, we analyze the transversal stability of GS using conditional Lyapunov exponents and a replica synchronization error-based method. We distinguish between strong GS, where the reservoir state depends smoothly on the input, and weak GS, where the synchronization still holds but loses smoothness and becomes more sensitive to perturbations, often accompanied by bubbling-like dynamics. Our results show that forecasting performance does not simply peak at the edge of conditional stability. For noise-free time series, optimal performance is achieved near the parameter value at which the sufficient condition for strong GS breaks down, while GS itself remains intact. In contrast, in the presence of observational noise, the optimal forecasting point shifts toward the vicinity of the bubbling transition, where transversal contraction is reduced, although GS is still present. In both cases, a pronounced degradation of performance occurs once bubbling becomes dominant. These findings highlight the importance of transversal stability in determining forecasting performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suetani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866416e0dea528ddeaa2dhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0283017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper