Guest editorial commentary discusses AI's impact on trust and authorship in science communication, suggesting significant implications.
This guest editorial commentary introduces a special issue of Science Communication on artificial intelligence’s (AI) dual role as both a tool for and a topic of science communication. It argues that this dual role redistributes communicative and epistemic agency in ways that unsettle established assumptions about authorship, credibility, and trust. The commentary reviews seven studies spanning practitioner use, audience cognition, and misinformation correction, then develops two theoretical questions: how AI reshapes the social infrastructure of trust in science, and what science communication means when scientific discovery itself is partially delegated to AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: