Formalizes interaction as an admissibility-gated process in cognitive systems, highlighting structural conditions for engagement persistence.
This paper formalises interaction as an admissibility-gated process within cognitive systems. Engagement is reframed as a constraint-governed continuation problem rather than a behavioural or communicative phenomenon. Interaction persists only while structural compatibility between participants remains sufficient to support continued state transitions. A minimal interaction state is defined by alignment (A), value (V), and energy cost (E), establishing the admissibility condition (A + V) > E as necessary for continuation. Interaction modes are shown to arise from constraint configurations, and termination is defined as incompatibility-conditioned collapse, consistent with the Constraint-Incompatibility Collapse Law (CICL). This work positions interaction as a Tier-7 instantiation of the Paton System, demonstrating that admissibility, constraint accumulation, and boundary formation operate equivalently in cognitive systems as in physical and mathematical domains. The result is a domain-neutral structural account of engagement persistence, independent of behavioural or psychological interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew John Paton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: