Comparative analysis assesses prediction accuracy of ray tracing tools in urban 5G environments, suggesting effective network design alternatives.
The use of millimeter-wave spectrum in fifth-generation (5G) systems is increasing the need for accurate prediction of received power and coverage in real deployment scenarios. In this context, ray tracing (RT) is a promising approach for site-specific analysis, although its reliability depends on how accurately different tools reproduce measurements in complex urban environments. This work presents a comparative assessment at 27 GHz of three RT tools: in-house Exact tool based on Vertical Plane Launching (VPL), Matlab 5G and open-source Sionna RT based on Shooting and Bouncing Rays (SBR). The comparison relies on a large outdoor walk-test campaign, including about 14,725 measurement points collected in a real urban area around a 27 GHz mMIMO base station, using real operator-provided antenna radiation patterns. Measured and simulated power levels are compared using statistical metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and a planning-oriented coverage-rate metric. The results show a reasonable agreement between simulations and measurements, with RMSE and MAE values around 10–12 dB, highlighting tool-specific behaviors related to boundary effects, interaction modeling, and high-power overestimation. This work confirms that RT is a flexible support for 5G preliminary network design, reducing the need for extensive drive tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lodato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: