Retrospective analysis compares single-position with dual-position lumbar fusion outcomes, indicating similar efficacy.
In this retrospective single-center analysis, single-position lateral OLIF was associated with shorter operative duration compared with dual-position lateral-then-prone OLIF with no significant impact on pedicle screw accuracy or spondylolisthesis reduction. In cases without need for posterior procedures beyond percutaneous instrumentation, surgeons may opt for either approach at their own discretion without clinically significant impact on postoperative alignment or complication rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: