PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation0 citationsOpen Access

Managing Complexity: Manager–Stakeholder Communication, Relational Dynamics, and the Dual Nature of RTW Communication

HBH. BertoliniUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMCM. CorbièreUniversité du Québec à MontréalANA. NegriniInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how managers perceive communication factors affecting the return to work process for employees with mental or musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Conducted four focus groups with 18 managers in Canada (Quebec and Ontario)
  • Utilized thematic analysis to identify communication facilitators and obstacles
  • Identified five themes of facilitators including trust, clarity, and collaboration
  • Determined seven themes of obstacles like distrust, ambiguity, and fragmentation that hinder communication
  • Emphasized the manager's role in bridging relationships among stakeholders

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The return to work (RTW) process of worker absent due to common mental disorders (CMD) or musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) represents a complex challenge that involves multiple stakeholders. The aim of this study was to examine how managers perceive the factors that facilitate or hinder communication with other stakeholders during the RTW process. Methods This qualitative study was based on four focus groups conducted in Canada (Quebec and Ontario) with 18 managers. Results Thematic analysis identified five themes related to facilitators and seven themes related to communication obstacles. Among the main facilitators, trust, clarity, and collaboration emerged as key elements that support effective coordination and the development of shared solutions. Obstacles, on the other hand, included distrust, ambiguity, and fragmentation, which can compromise the success of the process and increase the risk of tensions or relapses. The manager emerges as a bridging figure, central to the design of workplace accommodations, but whose role depends on the quality of relationships with the employee, colleagues, and other organizational stakeholders, as well as on the institutional support received. Conclusion The findings highlight that strengthening inter-stakeholder communication not only fosters the sustainable reintegration of employees with health conditions but also contributes to the development of more inclusive and resilient organizational environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bertolini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e867136e0dea528ddeb61fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10391-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Examine Facilitators and Barriers to Return to Work (RTW) for Employees with Common Mental Disorder (CMD) Symptoms: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Study2026
  2. 2Collaboration in the return-to-work process after sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ views on goals and roles2024
  3. 3Return-To-Work after mental illness: A qualitative study on factors promoting the reintegration into work2024
  4. 4“My patience has limits”: A qualitative study on how supervisors manage their conflicts of interest with employees who returned to work after mental health leave2026
  5. 5Strategies used by Occupational Therapists to overcome return-to-work obstacles perceived by workers with common mental disorders2024 · 2 citations