Examines how bilateral relationships influence research collaboration and innovation outcomes, suggesting new approaches for international scientific cooperation.
As the global political environment is becoming increasingly tense, it is crucial to understand the relationship between geopolitics and scientific collaboration. This study examines how bilateral relationships between countries are associated with research collaboration and innovation outcomes. It combines patent data from the European Patent Office’s PATSTAT database with the GDELT Event Database to test three key hypotheses: (1) international research collaboration improves research outcomes, (2) better bilateral relationships lead to increased collaboration, and (3) bilateral relationship quality affects collaboration outcomes. Results strongly support the first two hypotheses but only partially support the third. The findings suggest that although geopolitical tensions may affect the quantity of international research partnerships, they do not significantly impact all aspects of quality of existing collaborations. This study suggests the need for balanced approaches that promote international scientific cooperation while addressing security concerns and contributes to understanding the complex interplay between geopolitics, innovation systems, and research collaboration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: