PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Molecular Ecology2 citations

Unique Transcriptional Responses by the Sea Anemone Nematostella vectensis to Individual Bacteria: Roles for Bacterial Species, Secreted Products and the Microbiome

View Full Paper
QKQuinton KruegerBPBritney PhippenARAdam M. Reitzel

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify how the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis responds at the gene level to different bacterial exposures.
  • Exposed Nematostella vectensis to three bacterial species and their cell free supernatants.
  • Measured transcriptional responses through gene expression analysis.
  • Compared results with and without the native microbiome present.
  • Identified 829 differentially expressed genes in response to Bacillus velezensis.
  • Noted a significantly lower response with 49 differentially expressed genes for Vibrio diabolicus.
  • Highlighted that responses varied greatly based on whether live bacteria or their secreted products were present.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Animal responses to bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms are important for understanding how host–microbe interactions lead to divergent molecular responses by the host and the assembly of the holobiont. The immune system of the animal and the resident microbial community are critical factors in the response, or lack thereof, by a host to a newly encountered microbe. Here, we describe the transcriptional response of the model cnidarian Nematostella vectensis when exposed to three Live Cell (LC) isolates ( Bacillus velezensis , Pseudoalteromonas spiralis and Vibrio diabolicus ) or their Cell Free Supernatants (CFS) with and without the native microbiome. Gene expression revealed large variation in the overall response ranging from 829 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for antibiotically treated anemones exposed to B. velezensis to 49 DEGs in xenic individuals inoculated with V. diabolicus . The anemone's response similarly varied widely if the exposure was to live bacteria or the secreted products, especially for B. velezensis . Genes associated with the RIG‐I‐like immune pathway showed large differences in expression whereas the transcriptional variation for NF‐kB and toll‐like receptor were not significantly different. The response to each gram‐negative bacteria differed from a purified bacterial ligand (lipopolysaccharide). Together, these results support the hypothesis that N. vectensis mounts unique transcriptional responses to individual bacterial species and their products, which are dependent on the presence of the native microbiome. The complexity of this molecular response further highlights the dynamic interplay between cnidarians and microbes in the assembly and maintenance of the holobiont.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krueger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e867356e0dea528ddeb764https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.70339
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper