Pilot outcomes reveal increased clinician knowledge and counseling behaviors regarding online contraceptive information.
Objective Adolescents frequently encounter contraceptive information online. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and pilot outcomes of a clinician training module designed to support counseling about online contraceptive information. Methods We co-developed a contraceptive counseling training with community advisory boards. We recruited adolescent-serving clinicians across North Carolina to participate in the virtual 3-hour training. One of the five modules was Supporting Teens with Online Information . To assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and pilot outcomes of this module, participants completed pre-, immediate post-, and 4-month-post-intervention measures about counseling about online contraceptive information and participated in a 4-month post-intervention interview. Analysis used a convergent mixed methods approach. Results 35 clinicians participated, with 27 (77%) completing the 4-month interview. Immediately post-intervention, the module was perceived as acceptable (mean=4.6, SD 0.5), appropriate (4.7, 0.5), and feasible (4.6, 0.5) on a 5-point scale. Participants showed immediate and 4-month increases in knowledge, beliefs, self-efficacy, and self-reported counseling behaviors (p<0.05). Qualitative results indicated that participants liked the module and many reported adapting their counseling approach and/or providing new patient-facing resources. However, they faced barriers like time constraints and difficulty remaining abreast of social media information. They recommended inclusion of specific social media posts (versus overarching themes) and a more accessible resource toolkit. Conclusions This module demonstrated feasibility, with clinician-reported pilot outcomes showing increases at both immediate post-intervention and 4-month follow-up. This intervention is among the first developed to support person-centered counseling about online contraceptive information and warrants further investigation in a rigorous trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: