Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis assesses green hydrogen production outcomes in Italian ports, suggesting implications for coastal energy transition.
The global transition toward low-carbon energy has positioned green hydrogen as a key decarbonization carrier for coastal industries and maritime sectors facing simultaneous energy transition and freshwater scarcity pressures. However, comprehensive techno-economic studies that integrate seawater desalination, brine management, photovoltaic energy, and battery storage into unified green hydrogen production frameworks remain limited in the existing literature. This study develops a dynamic simulation model of a solar-powered Green Hydrogen Production System using TRNSYS and PVGIS platforms, assessing 36 configurations that combine three brine management designs, three photovoltaic capacities ranging from 5 to 10 MW, and four battery storage sizes at four Italian coastal port locations over a 20-year economic horizon. The Levelised Cost of Hydrogen ranges from 5 to 8 €/kg across all tested configurations, with the sea discharge design proving most cost-effective and Syracuse recording the minimum LCoH of 4.32 €/kg owing to abundant solar irradiance. Governmental subsidies between 7 and 12 M€ are required across all configurations to achieve the IEA competitiveness threshold of 1.5 €/kg. These outcomes establish geographic solar availability and brine management strategy as the primary economic determinants, confirming that coastal port infrastructure represents a strategically optimal platform for scalable green hydrogen deployment aligned with maritime decarbonization objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: