Key result
Electrical cardioversion yields 0 thromboembolic events in patients with known LV thrombus.
Why the study?
The thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular thrombus is poorly defined, resulting in variable clinical practice.
Does electrical cardioversion cause clinically apparent thromboembolic complications in patients with imaging-documented left ventricular thrombus?
Systematic Review (n=68)
Does electrical cardioversion cause clinically apparent thromboembolic complications in patients with imaging-documented left ventricular thrombus?
Available limited evidence suggests that electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus does not result in clinically overt thromboembolic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for cardioversion safety in LV thrombus; prospective RCTs needed before clinical adoption.
Background The thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular (LV) thrombus is poorly defined, producing variable clinical practice. We performed a systematic review to synthesize reported thromboembolic outcomes after cardioversion in patients with imaging-documented LV thrombus. Methods We searched PubMed and Scopus through 25 July 2025 for studies reporting outcomes after external direct-current cardioversion or internal/intra-procedural electrical shocks in patients with known LV thrombus. Case reports and pharmacological cardioversion studies were excluded. The primary outcome was clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Results Three retrospective studies met criteria, comprising 68 patients with known, imaging-proven LV thrombus. Thrombus morphology was predominantly laminated/fixed, but about 8% of patients had mobile thrombi in one series. Anticoagulation practices varied; a subset (21%) had no anticoagulation prior to electrical cardioversion. In total, 60 patients underwent direct-current cardioversion while eight patients underwent multiple internal intra-procedural cardioversions in the setting of known LV thrombus. Overall, no thromboembolic events directly attributable to cardioversion were observed over a follow-up period of 3 months to 1 year. Conclusion Available evidence, although limited, did not identify clinically overt thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus. Decisions should, however, be individualized, imaging-guided, accompanied by optimized anticoagulation whenever possible and multidisciplinary discussions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sama et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Left ventricular thrombus (n=68). Electrical cardioversion was evaluated on Clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Electrical cardioversion in 68 patients with known left ventricular thrombus resulted in 0 clinically apparent thromboembolic events over 3 months to 1 year of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: