PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition2 citations

Two‐Period Magmatism and Mineralisation in the Galinge Skarn Fe‐Co Deposit, East Kunlun, Qinghai: Constraints From Geochronology and Geochemistry

View Full Paper
XXXingyu XiaoWZWanhui ZhangDYDe Yang

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the relationship between two periods of magmatism and mineralisation in the Galinge Fe-Co deposit.
  • Utilized petrography, geochronology, and geochemistry to analyze the deposit.
  • Conducted EPMA and LA-ICP-MS analyses on magnetite and ore-forming fluids.
  • Examined isotopic signatures to trace sources of mineralisation.
  • Identified early and late magnetite formation periods linked to distinct magmatic intrusions.
  • Confirmed both magnetite types originate from deep magmatic sources with similar geochemical signatures.
  • Demonstrated variations in formation conditions, including temperature and Co incorporation mechanisms.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Galinge Fe‐Co deposit in the East Kunlun orogenic belt is a large skarn iron deposit associated with critical metal cobalt. This study elucidates its two‐period magmatism and mineralisation and their genetic links on the basis of petrography, geochronology and geochemistry. The early granodiorite (236.1 ± 1.4 Ma) is associated with the early magnetite‐sulphide period (major metallogenic event), whereas later intermediate–mafic dikes (227.1 ± 1.7 Ma) correspond to the late veined magnetite period. Petro‐geochemical results show that both intrusions are metaluminous I‐type granites with similar geochemical signatures (parallel REE patterns, high Mg#, LILE enrichment, HFSE depletion), suggesting derivation from partial melting of the lower crust with mantle and a postcollisional setting. H‐O‐S isotopes show that ore‐forming fluid and ore materials during the major metallogenic period were predominantly from a deep magmatic source. EPMA and LA‐ICP‐MS analyses classify two‐period magnetite as skarn‐type magnetite. Early magnetite formed at higher temperatures with Co incorporated via isomorphism, while late magnetite crystallised under more reduced conditions with Co mainly in sulphide inclusions. Co/Ni ratios for magnetite (< 1) indicate deep magmatic origins. Collectively, temporal–spatial correlations, shared deep magmatic provenance and geochemical coherence demonstrate that both magnetite formations are related to two periods of magmatic intrusion activity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9ba2a85696592c86ec700https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.70044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper