This theoretical framework reveals how identity, dignity, and legitimacy drive conflict, suggesting new approaches for peacebuilding.
This paper presents a unified, structural theory of human conflict. Drawing on a broad interdisciplinary review spanning sociology, psychology, political philosophy, anthropology, ethology, and cultural studies, the theory proposes that nearly all forms of conflictinterpersonal, communal, political, cultural, and international-arise when one or more of three symbolic pillars are threatened: identity, dignity, and legitimacy. The framework argues that conflict is fundamentally symbolic rather than material, and that cultural practices-rituals, arts, embodied traditions, music, and communal ceremony-function as regulatory infrastructure that prevents symbolic destabilization and maintains social cohesion. The theory engages critically with existing frameworks in conflict studies while proposing a synthesis that transcends disciplinary boundaries and offers practical implications for peacebuilding, cultural policy, and community development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jorge Marquez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: