Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dataset supports proactive service migration in vehicular scenarios, aiding MEC research implications.
This dataset supports research on proactive service migration in Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) environments for vehicular scenarios. It was generated using a simulation setup built on OMNeT++ (6.1), Simu5G (1.2.2), SUMO (1.22), and Veins (5.3.1), using a subsection of the Turin SUMO Traffic (TuST) scenario covering approximately 1.2 × 1.2 km with 10 base stations. The dataset comprises 45 simulation runs, each corresponding to a 3,600 s window during the 7–8 AM peak hour, with approximately 1,300 vehicles per run. Mobility and radio network data were collected at 3 s intervals through RAVENS, a data collection system interfacing with the ETSI MEC Location Service and Radio Network Information Service at each MEC Host. The repository contains: Raw data: Per-run CSV files as exported by the RAVENS Data Collection System in Data Saving mode, containing per-UE location, speed, bearing, serving base station, and Layer 2 uplink/downlink delay measurements. Each run uses a different random seed to ensure variability in vehicle density and mobility patterns, generated using SUMO scripting tools with manually adjusted density scaling factors following a normal distribution (mean = 0.3). Processed data: Feature-engineered CSV files ready for model training, including 5 lagged time steps of position, speed, bearing, and serving cell, Euclidean distances to all 10 base stations, one-hot encoded categorical features (96 features per timestep), and multi-horizon target labels (t+3 s to t+15 s) with an exit class for UEs departing the scenario. The 45 runs were split into 31 training, 7 validation, and 7 test runs.The mobility traces are derived from the Turin SUMO Traffic (TuST) scenario introduced in: M. Rapelli, C. Casetti, and G. Gagliardi, 'Vehicular Traffic Simulation in the City of Turin from Raw Data,' IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 4189–4204, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TMC.2021.3075985.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araújo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: