System identification models enhance control of a piston engine–dynamometer system, indicating improved performance and stability.
Piston engine system identification models are crucial for autonomous and control-oriented applications. However, piston engines exhibit relatively unstable behavior, which may lead to overspeed during open-loop operation. In this study, system identification of a piston engine is investigated on a piston engine–dynamometer test bench. The identification process is carried out under closed-loop conditions to ensure safe and reliable operation. Known system parameters are utilized to transform the closed-loop system into an equivalent open-loop representation. Three system identification models—a State-Space model, a nonlinear ARX model, and a Hammerstein–Wiener model—are employed and comparatively evaluated. The identified models are validated based on their closed-loop responses. Subsequently, a gain scheduled cruise controller is designed using the identified model and implemented on an engine dynamic model. Finally, a disturbance observer is integrated into the cruise controller to enhance disturbance rejection performance. The disturbance observer is developed based on the identified system model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozkan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: