PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases0 citations

Real‐World Data of Tofacitinib Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Taiwanese Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis From a Drug‐Based Cohort Study

View Full Paper
SHSong‐Chou HsiehWCWei‐Sheng ChenJHJui-Chieh Hu

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib compared to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Taiwanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • Conducted a 5-year prospective cohort study in Taiwanese patients initiating tofacitinib or TNFi.
  • Effectiveness assessments included various disease activity and disability indices measured every 24 weeks.
  • Safety and adherence were tracked throughout the study.
  • No significant differences in effectiveness outcomes between tofacitinib and TNFi were observed.
  • Adverse event rates were similar for both treatments, including serious infections.
  • Persistence and adherence rates were comparable for tofacitinib and TNFi.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To assess the long‐term effectiveness and safety of, and persistence/adherence to, tofacitinib (an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis RA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Taiwanese patients with RA in real‐world settings. Methods This was a 5 year, prospective cohort study in Taiwanese patients with RA newly initiating tofacitinib or TNFi. Patients received standard care per treating rheumatologists and fulfillment of National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria. Effectiveness outcomes (baseline and every 24 weeks) included: Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Clinical Disease Activity Index; Health Assessment Questionnaire‐Disability Index; and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment‐RA. Differences between groups were compared using mixed logistic regression models. Safety and persistence/adherence were assessed throughout. Results In total, 267 patients were included (tofacitinib, n = 145; TNFi, n = 122). No significant differences in effectiveness outcomes for tofacitinib versus TNFi were reported before or after propensity score adjustment. In patients receiving tofacitinib and TNFi, rates of adverse events (AEs; 56.6% vs. 55.7%), serious AEs (20.0% vs. 21.3%), major adverse cardiovascular events (0% vs. 0.8%), malignancy (2.1% vs. 0.8%), and deaths (1.4% vs. 3.3%) were similar. Serious infections/herpes zoster occurred in 13.1%/12.4% and 8.2%/3.3% of patients receiving tofacitinib and TNFi, respectively. No venous thromboembolism events were reported. Persistence/adherence was comparable between tofacitinib and TNFi. Conclusion Tofacitinib effectiveness and persistence/adherence were generally similar to TNFi in this real‐world analysis in Taiwanese patients with RA. Safety outcomes were consistent with the known safety profiles of tofacitinib and TNFi. Trail Registration EUPAS13431.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hsieh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bb6285696592c86ed0d1https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.70653
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper