This study investigates two NO x -mitigation strategies, namely exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and water–diesel emulsification, in a diesel–hydrogen dual-fuel compression ignition engine. A validated three-dimensional CFD model is employed to reproduce the combustion process of a single-cylinder engine operating at 1800 rpm and 5 bar of IMEP. The model is first calibrated and validated against experimental data for conventional diesel operation and two dual-fuel conditions (8% and 18% hydrogen energy share) conducted on a test bench, showing good agreement in terms of in-cylinder pressure, heat-release rate, and NO x emissions. Simulations demonstrate that hydrogen enrichment increases mixture reactivity and peak temperature, leading to higher NO x formation. EGR rates of 5–15% effectively reduce peak temperatures and suppress NO x formation, although they increase CO emissions and hydrogen slip due to the reduced mixture reactivity. Water–diesel emulsions containing up to 8% water (E8) also reduce NO x emissions by lowering local peak temperatures through evaporative cooling, but unlike EGR they promote a more uniform combustion process. As a result, the 8% emulsion (E8) leads not only to the largest NO x reduction but also to a slight decrease in hydrogen slip compared to the baseline conventional diesel case. • A CFD model was validated for a diesel-H 2 dual-fuel engine. • EGR and diesel-water emulsions were assessed for NO x reduction. • 15% EGR significantly decreased NO x but slightly increased CO. • Addition of water emulsions presented a more discrete decrease in NO x . • Temperature profiles prove these strategies eliminate hot spots and hinder thermal NO x .
Palomba et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: