Demonstrates improved prediction accuracy in multi-period optimal power flow, highlighting energy system optimization.
• Proposing PI-STGCN for MPOPF with explicit transmission interface limits; • Capturing spatiotemporal dependencies via graph convolution and GRU; • A physics-informed training strategy to guide the data-driven solution toward feasible solutions; • Achieving high accuracy and reduced violations across different power system scales. With the widespread deployment of renewable energy sources (RES) and energy storage systems, multi-period optimal power flow (MPOPF) has become a key analytical tool for coordinating short-term and long-term power system operations over a predefined time horizon. High RES penetration, however, tends to induce transmission congestion across inter-regional transmission interfaces. Incorporating transmission interface constraints into MPOPF remains challenging due to the substantial computational complexity introduced by inter-temporal coupling and the spatial interdependence of transmission interfaces. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a physics-informed spatiotemporal graph convolutional neural network (PI-STGCN) for solving MPOPF with explicit transmission interface constraints. The proposed PI-STGCN architecture integrates three key components. First, a dual-path graph convolutional module with transmission interface embedding captures spatial dependencies among grid buses. Second, a gated recurrent unit (GRU) models temporal dynamics across consecutive operating periods. Third, a physics-informed loss function incorporates branch flow limits and transmission interface flow limits as soft constraints to enhance solution feasibility. Extensive experiments on modified IEEE 30-bus, 118-bus, and 300-bus systems with high RES penetration demonstrate that PI-STGCN consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in predictive accuracy, constraint satisfaction, and generalization capability. In particular, on the IEEE 300-bus system, it achieves an overall prediction accuracy of 98.11% and reduces the maximum violation magnitude by 48.7% compared with the best competing approach. Moreover, PI-STGCN exhibits strong data efficiency. By using only 60% of the training data, MAPEs of 1.27% for the IEEE 30-bus system and 1.88% for the IEEE 118-bus system are achieved, outperforming baseline approaches training on the full dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: