PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Journal on Processing and Energy in Agriculture0 citationsOpen Access

Thermal performance comparison of carbonized and uncarbonized briquettes derived from maize agricultural waste

IOIzuchukwu OkaforOOOkay OkoraforCECollins Eze

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the thermal performance and combustion characteristics of carbonized versus uncarbonized maize briquettes.
  • Four samples were prepared: uncarbonized maize cob, uncarbonized cob-stalk blend, carbonized maize cob, and carbonized cob-stalk blend.
  • Performance metrics like density, moisture content, and calorific value were analyzed using ASTM protocols.
  • Cooking and fuel efficiency were evaluated based on empirical equations.
  • Uncarbonized briquettes had higher calorific values, with Sample A achieving the highest energy yield.
  • Sample B showed the best cooking efficiency at 17.285% and fuel efficiency at 19.765%, with the lowest fuel consumption rate.
  • Carbonized Sample D provided cleaner combustion and competitive fuel efficiency despite lower energy values.

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the thermal performance and combustion characteristics of four biomass briquette samples derived from maize residues: uncarbonized maize cob (Sample A), uncarbonized cob-stalk blend (Sample B), carbonized maize cob (Sample C), and carbonized cob-stalk blend (Sample D). Briquettes were produced using cassava starch as binder and shaped into standardized moulds cylindrical for uncarbonized and cuboidal for carbonized samples. Key performance metrics including density, moisture content, ash content, calorific value, fuel consumption rate, cooking efficiency, and fuel efficiency were analysed using ASTM protocols and empirical equations. Results showed that uncarbonized briquettes exhibited higher calorific values and mass, with Sample A recording the highest energy yield. However, Sample B demonstrated superior cooking efficiency (17.285%) and fuel efficiency (19.765%), coupled with the lowest fuel consumption rate (0.985 kg/hr), indicating optimal combustion dynamics. Carbonized briquettes, particularly Sample D, offered cleaner combustion and competitive fuel efficiency (18.235%) despite slightly lower energy values. These findings suggest that blending maize cob and stalk enhances briquette performance, and that uncarbonized briquettes especially cob-stalk mixtures offer a viable, low-cost solution for household energy needs in rural settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okafor et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bb9e85696592c86ed373https://doi.org/10.5937/jpea29-62191
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper