Assesses factors influencing discriminatory workplace attitudes toward recovered COVID-19 patients, suggesting actions to combat them.
Recovered COVID-19 patients could face occupational discrimination when they are post-recovery workforce reintegration. This study aims to assess the determinants of discriminatory workplace attitudes towards recovered COVI-19 patients in the early stages of the epidemic in China, to provide a scientific reference for formulating measures to mitigate workplace discrimination in infectious disease prevention and control. Discriminatory workplace attitudes against recovered COVID-19 patients were evaluated using two scenario-based questions. The independent variables encompassed demographic characteristics, healthcare-related factors, regional classification, COVID-19 awareness components, exposure history, and pandemic knowledge. 27 cities in 9 provinces in China were selected randomly according to the gross domestic product ranking and geographical distribution. A total of 100 participants per city were surveyed using a structured questionnaire from May to June 2020. From the initial 2,700 questionnaires distributed, 2,377 valid responses were obtained, yielding an effective response rate of 88.04%. Pearson chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used to test the correlation between discriminatory attitudes and potential determinants. 55.66% of respondents displayed discriminatory workplace attitudes related to COVID-19. Sex, age, occupation, region, infection status of relatives and friends, perceived infection risk, perceived COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and COVID-19 knowledge score were significantly correlated with discriminatory workplace attitudes (p < 0.05). Based on the key findings of this study, we recommended COVID-19 information campaigns to reduce workplace discrimination including accurate information on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, COVID-19 knowledge, especially for the key intervention populations including females, the elderly, residents in central region and migrant workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: