Demonstrates a composite that maintains EMI shielding in extreme thermal conditions, suggesting enhanced safety and signal integrity.
Conventional conductive polymer composites often lose electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding capability under high-temperature or flaming conditions due to poor thermal stability and structural collapse, limiting their use in environments requiring both fire safety and signal integrity. This study presents a sandwich-structured composite to address this issue, featuring a Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene-coated ramie fabric inter layer encapsulated within thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) layers containing a carbon black (CB)/ammonium polyphosphate (APP) system. This architecture provides structural reinforcement and enables a synergistic shielding and flame-retardant mechanism. With a 30 wt% CB loading, the composite exhibits an exceptional EMI shielding effectiveness of 56.83 dB in the X-band and achieves a UL-94 V-0 rating. Notably, it retains remarkable shielding stability under extreme thermal conditions, preserving 36.12 dB after cone calorimeter testing. Furthermore, it maintains 99.99% electromagnetic wave attenuation even after direct exposure to an alcohol lamp flame for 20 min. This performance originates from a synergistic effect, where the burning of the outer TPU/CB/APP layers promotes the formation of a protective conductive char through physicochemical interactions, which works in tandem with the intact, highly conductive ramie/Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene inter layer to maintain the shielding integrity. This work provides an innovative strategy for developing high-performance EMI shielding materials for harsh environments. • A sandwich composite maintains structural integrity and EMI shielding ability after combustion. • Achieves 56.83 dB EMI shielding (X-band, >99.999% attenuation) with UL-94 V-0 rating initially. • Shielding 99.99% EMI after 20 min alcohol lamp burning, retaining 36.12 dB even after cone calorimeter test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: