Identifying primary ceramic forming techniques is often problematic when surface traces are altered or erased by secondary shaping on the potter’s wheel, particularly in vessels combining hand-building and wheel use. This study aims to develop a quantitative, non-destructive method to distinguish wheel-throwing and wheel-coiling techniques by analyzing internal fabric features. Experimental replicas of Middle Minoan handleless conical cups (18th cent. BC), produced using wheel-throwing-off-the-hump and wheel-coiling techniques, were investigated using X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT). Macropores were segmented from complete 3D µCT datasets and their shape preferred orientation was quantitatively assessed through ellipsoid fitting, orientation distribution functions, and pole figure analysis. The results reveal systematic and reproducible differences between the two forming techniques: wheel-coiled vessels show predominantly horizontal pore elongation, expressed as equatorial girdle textures and vertically clustered short axes, whereas wheel-thrown vessels display inclined pore orientations, forming displaced girdles and ring-like short-axis distributions. These contrasting orientation patterns reflect distinct deformation fields imposed during vessel shaping. The study demonstrates that quantitative 3D analysis of pore orientation in whole vessels provides reliable criteria for identifying ceramic forming techniques and confirms previous qualitative observations. This approach offers a robust framework for technological analysis of ceramics and can be applied to both complete vessels and suitably oriented fragments.
Caloi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: