Demonstrates enhanced beam quality in laser arrays through real-time aberration correction, suggesting improved performance under turbulence.
Laser beam combining is essential for achieving high-power and high-radiance output. However, atmospheric turbulence induces independent tip–tilt aberrations across discrete sub-beams in laser array systems, which severely degrades the concentration of far-field energy. Traditional wavefront sensing techniques are primarily designed for the continuous wavefront of a single laser and are not directly applicable to laser array, whereas indirect optimization-based methods often suffer from slow convergence and limited real-time performance. To address these limitations, this study introduces a tip–tilt aberration compensation system for laser array propagation based on cooperative beacons with a shared-aperture transmit–receive configuration. The primary innovation consists of a modified Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWFS) tailored to a discrete multi-beam layout, which facilitates the direct, independent, and simultaneous measurement of tip–tilt aberrations for each sub-beam. In conjunction with a segmented deformable mirror (SDM), the architecture can facilitate real-time closed-loop correction with high bandwidth and high precision. Numerical simulations of a 7-, 19-, and 37-beam laser array, together with validation experiments utilizing a 30-beam configuration, demonstrate that the proposed approach effectively suppresses tip–tilt error induced by turbulence. After closed-loop correction, the Strehl ratio (SR) increases above 0.92 (r0=5 cm), while the beam quality factor β reduces below 1.37 (r0=5 cm). Furthermore, the system retains performance stability as the number of sub-beams increases, demonstrating the scalability of the proposed method. In contrast to conventional approaches designed for a continuous wavefront, the proposed method offers a feasible approach for a discrete laser array system, providing robust and scalable tip–tilt correction under varying atmospheric conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: