A prospective cohort study associates a healthy sleep score with reduced pneumonia risk, highlighting sleep's importance for respiratory health.
Background Sleep disturbances are hypothesized to increase susceptibility to pneumonia; however, most evidence arises from studies examining isolated sleep characteristics. The relationship between a multidimensional healthy sleep score and pneumonia risk remains unclear. Herein, the association between a multidimensional healthy sleep score and risk of pneumonia was evaluated. Methods This prospective analysis encompassed 361,589 participants from the United Kingdom (UK) Biobank (mean age: 56.1 years; 46.1% male). Five sleep characteristics—sleep duration, chronotype, insomnia symptoms, snoring, and daytime sleepiness—were used to construct a healthy sleep score (range: 0–5). Participants were categorized into poor (0–1), intermediate (2–3), and healthy (4–5) sleep score categories. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pneumonia incidence. Results Over a median follow-up period of 13.2 years, there were 20,116 new cases of pneumonia. A healthy sleep score was associated with a 26% lower risk of pneumonia (adjusted HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.69–0.80). This association exhibited a graded pattern, with higher sleep scores associated with progressively lower risk. The absence of frequent daytime sleepiness (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74–0.85) and insomnia symptoms (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86–0.91) exhibited the strongest component-specific inverse associations. Associations were stronger among participants younger than 60 years and females (P for interaction <0.001 for both). Conclusions A multidimensional healthy sleep score is associated with a lower risk of pneumonia. These findings support the potential relevance of multidimensional sleep assessment to respiratory infection susceptibility and warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: