This work assesses large language models' ability to solve complex arithmetic word problems, highlighting implications for their reasoning capabilities.
Most existing arithmetic word problem (AWP) solvers focus on solving simple examples. Transfer case-AWPs (TC-AWPs) involve scenarios where objects are transferred between agents. The widely used AWP datasets mainly consist of simple TC-AWPs (problems that involve a single object transfer). Current large language models (LLMs) are capable of solving most of these simple TC-AWPs effectively. In this work, we focus on assessing the solving capability of LLMs (ChatGPT and Gemini) for complex TC-AWPs (where multiple types of objects are transferred or more than one transfer of an object is performed). Since the popular AWP datasets contain only simple TC-AWPs, we first generate complex TC-AWPs using an ontological approach. We utilize these complex examples to assess LLMs’ word-problem-solving capabilities. We observe that the accuracy of LLMs falls down rapidly as the number of object transfers is increased to 3 or 4. An approach for solving TC-AWPs using ontologies and M/L exists in the literature. We propose an extension of this approach that can handle complex TC-AWPs and find that, compared to the current LLMs, the proposed solution gives better accuracy for complex TC-AWPs. We analyze the failed cases of the LLM approach and find that the reasoning capabilities of LLMs need a lot of improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: