PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Annals of Surgery1 citations

Mucosal Impedance in the Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

View Full Paper
SESven E. ErikssonJRJesse RappaportAllegheny Health NetworkSAShahin AyaziAllegheny Health Network

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the role of mucosal impedance in assessing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its implications for surgical management.
  • Review of clinical studies on mucosal impedance in GERD.
  • Comparison of mucosal impedance findings with conventional reflux testing.
  • Assessment of mucosal recovery after medical or surgical interventions.
  • Reduced distal esophageal impedance is noted in patients with GERD, including those with non-erosive phenotypes.
  • Mucosal impedance improves following effective medical or surgical therapies.
  • Integrating mucosal impedance may refine phenotyping and patient selection for GERD treatment.

Abstract

Objective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has traditionally relied on endoscopy to identify macroscopic injury and ambulatory pH monitoring to quantify reflux burden. However, acid exposure time does not directly assess epithelial injury or mucosal recovery, and normalization of reflux metrics does not consistently predict symptom resolution after intervention. Mucosal impedance (MI) is an endoscopic, tissue-level measure of esophageal mucosal integrity that reflects cumulative reflux-related injury and barrier dysfunction. Clinical studies demonstrate reduced distal esophageal impedance in GERD, including non-erosive phenotypes, and with improvement following effective medical or surgical therapy. By complementing conventional reflux testing with direct assessment of mucosal integrity, MI potentially offers a framework for refined phenotyping, improved patient selection, and objective evaluation of treatment response. This review synthesizes the physiologic rationale, technical considerations, and clinical evidence supporting MI, with emphasis on its implications for surgical decision-making and outcome assessment in GERD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eriksson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb09c9553a5433e34b42bbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000007076
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Assessment for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Long-Term Reflux Outcomes–A Pragmatic Study of Mucosal Integrity Testing2025
  3. 3Mid-esophageal mucosal impedance reflects mucosal integrity and phenotypes refractory reflux-like symptoms2026
  4. 4Clinical Significance of the Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance and Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index in the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease2025
  5. 5Lower mean nocturnal baseline impedance in erosive reflux disease, Barrett’s Esophagus, and elevated body mass index compared to nonerosive reflux disease2025