Composition, Activity, and Stability of IrO x Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts

The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is integral to several electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies, including carbon dioxide reduction to value added fuels, nitrogen reduction to ammonia, reversible fuel cells, rechargeable metal−air batteries, and water electrolysis to produce hydrogen. Iridium oxide (IrOx) is widely recognized as the benchmark OER catalyst for acidic environments. Despite widespread use of IrOx catalysts, most notably in proton-exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWEs), a comprehensive understanding of the physicochemical properties of commercial catalysts and the impact of these properties on both the activity and stability of these catalysts is lacking. Here, we study commercial IrOx catalysts with different physicochemical properties, three nominally considered amorphous and three rutile, to elucidate how structural and compositional variations affect OER activity and stability. Utilizing standardized aqueous electrochemical protocols, time-resolved dissolution quantification using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and physicochemical characterization, including multiple synchrotron X-ray techniques, we systematically correlate catalyst properties with OER performance and degradation behavior aided by principal component analysis (PCA). Our results demonstrate the general trend of amorphous IrOx having higher intrinsic activity but limited stability and crystalline rutile IrO2 having lower activity but enhanced stability against dissolution. The trends within the amorphous and rutile catalyst groups correlate with inherent material properties, including phase composition and structure, crystallinity, particle size, surface area, and surface structure/chemistry. Notably, we identify a rutile catalyst with the largest crystallite/domain sizes, moderate surface area, a small fraction of hydrous phase, and a favorable pore structure (trimodal distributions of pore sizes ranging from 2−5 nm) that exhibits the best balance between activity and stability among the six catalysts studied here. These findings illustrate a fundamental structure-governed trade-off between activity and stability and highlight the critical role of surface chemistry modification and structure engineering in IrOx catalyst optimization.