PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Iconic Research and Engineering Journals0 citations

Predicting Indicator Bacteria and Classifying Pathogen Risk in Improved Groundwater Supplies Using ANN, SVR, and SVC: Evidence from Makurdi Metropolis, Nigeria

VSV. J SiniEEE. O. EzehFAF. F Ashiekaa

Key Points

  • To assess microbial quality of groundwater and predict indicator bacteria levels using machine learning models.
  • Collected 384 water samples from shallow boreholes and wells in Makurdi.
  • Analyzed samples for indicator bacteria using standard methods.
  • Developed and compared Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models.
  • 95.6% of samples classified as Safe, while 4.4% were Unsafe due to fecal indicators.
  • ANN outperformed SVR in predicting MPN and total coliform levels.
  • Location and month significantly influenced microbial contamination.

Abstract

Improved groundwater sources are widely relied upon for domestic water supply in Nigerian urban centers, yet their microbiological safety remains uncertain. This study assessed the microbial quality of groundwater in Makurdi metropolis and evaluated the performance of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector models for predicting indicator bacteria levels and sanitary safety status. A total of 384 water samples were collected from shallow boreholes and concrete-lined wells across four locations and analyzed for Most Probable Number (MPN), total coliform, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella using standard methods. Overall, 95.6% of samples were classified as Safe, while 4.4% were Unsafe due to detection of faecal indicators. Indicator bacteria levels varied widely, with MPN ranging from 2 to 95 MPN/100 mL and total coliform from 6 to 90 CFU/100 mL, demonstrating substantial spatial and temporal heterogeneity. ANN and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models were developed to predict continuous indicator bacteria outcomes from routinely available variables. ANN outperformed SVR for both MPN (R² = 0.583 vs 0.480) and total coliform (R² = 0.567 vs 0.433). For sanitary risk classification, ANN demonstrated better ability to detect Unsafe samples than Support Vector Classification under class-imbalanced conditions. Synaptic weight analysis revealed that location and month were the most influential predictors, indicating that microbial contamination was driven primarily by spatial and temporal factors. The findings show that improved sources are not inherently safe and that machine learning models can provide valuable decision-support tools for proactive groundwater quality management in resource-limited settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0ac4553a5433e34b4b01https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i9-1715079
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting irrigation water quality indices in a typical mining dominated area in the Upper West region of Ghana using multiple machine learning techniques2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Development and deployment of a groundwater quality prediction tool for Béchar, Southwest Algeria: benchmarking seven machine learning algorithms2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Machine learning–driven groundwater quality classification using physicochemical parameters and regulatory thresholds2026
  4. 4Machine learning modelling of a nonlinear environmental index with sensitivity analysis for groundwater assessment2026 · 24 citations
  5. 5Prediction of Residual Chlorine in Water Distribution Network Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)2026