Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey evaluates methylmalonic acid, cobalamin, and homocysteine for vitamin B12 status, indicating methylmalonic acid may be the best marker.
ABSTRACT Background Diagnosing low vitamin B₁₂ status is important to reduce megaloblastic anemia and neurological disorders. The lack of a highly specific and sensitive clinical marker and questions about appropriate cutoffs hamper early detection. Objectives We evaluated the predictive power of 3 conventional markers for inadequate vitamin B₁₂ status (total cobalamin [B₁₂], methylmalonic acid [MMA], and total homocysteine [tHcy]) using the combined B₁₂ indicator, 3cB₁₂ (≤-0.5), as a reference. Additionally, we derived optimum cutoffs for each conventional marker and compared the prevalence to that from traditional cutoffs. Design Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004 data for B₁₂, MMA, and tHcy for persons ≥20 y with normal renal function, we devised a training set (1999–2002, n=7,469) to derive new optimum cutoffs and a validation set (2003–2004, n=3,641) to test them. All analyses were weighted and accounted for clustered design. Results In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) for MMA was 0.963, followed by B₁₂ (0.944) and tHcy (0.937); it further increased with 2- and 3-marker models (0.985–0.998). In the validation set, the diagnostic accuracy (Youden's index) for the new optimum cutoffs was 0.80 for MMA >229 nmol/L and 0.69 for B₁₂ <220 pmol/L and tHcy >10.4 μmol/L. Among the traditional cutoffs, the Youden's index varied (0.30–0.79); B₁₂ <126 or <148 pmol/L and MMA >376 nmol/L had the highest specificity (>99%). The latter also had reasonable sensitivity (54.9%) and generated an apparent (2.35%) and a sensitivity/specificity-adjusted prevalence (2.48%) close to the 3cB₁₂ reference estimate (2.74%). Conclusions When using a single marker, MMA >376 nmol/L may be a useful cutoff for healthy populations with low (<5%) prevalence of inadequate vitamin B₁₂ status to minimize false positives, whereas MMA >229 nmol/L may be preferred for screening higher-risk groups to detect more cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mineva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: