Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research analyzes the psychometric properties of the SEA-P in women, suggesting its reliability for measuring economic abuse.
Economic abuse is a different type of intimate partner violence; however, it is little researched in Latin American women. The aim of the research was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Scale of Economic Abuse Peruvian version (SEA-P). Two purposive samples were used. In the first sample (n 1 = 300, M age = 30.6) the exploratory factor analysis proposed a unidimensional solution of 11 items (explained variance = 60%) and the replicability of the construct was optimal (latent H-index = .96 and observed = .85). In the second sample (n 2 = 294 M age = 31.63) confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional model and reliability was excellent (αordinal = .86, ω = .83). Configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance was found (ΔCFI 0.010, ΔSRMR 0.030), revealing that the construct has the same meaning in both age groups (18-29 and 30-56 years old). Furthermore, in both samples, statistically significant relationships were found with four types of intimate partner violence: psychological, physical, sexual, and controlling behaviors. It is concluded that the SEA-P is a valid and reliable unidimensional instrument to measure economic abuse within the couple relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: