This framework reveals cosmological constants from geometry, indicating new parameters and predictions.
The 4D Clockwork Universe (4DCU) is a geometric framework in which physical constants, cosmological observables, and the evolution of the universe itself emerge from a single constraint on the three-sphere: Ti^2 + Ci^2 = 1, where Ti is the temporal amplitude of a four-vector and Ci is its spatial amplitude. This unit-sphere constraint is identically the Special Relativistic energy-momentum relation for a single particle; 4DCU extends it cosmologically by allowing Ti to evolve in time via an entropy-loss ODE. CONSTANTS FROM GEOMETRY Six physical constants treated as independent inputs in standard physics become geometric projections of one algebraic number Phi_4 = 1.92756 (the tetranacci constant, root of x^4 = x^3+x^2+x+1, associated with the H_4 Coxeter group of the 600-cell). These include the speed of light c (geodesic pole of S^3 velocity), the Stefan-Boltzmann constant sigma_SB = pi^2/60 (spatial entropy sector), Newton's G_0 = pi^2/180 (temporal entropy sector), the Hubble tension ratio 1/(Phi_4 - 1) = 1.0781, and the cosmological constant Omega_Lambda. PARAMETER-FREE PREDICTIONS Five independent cosmological predictions agree with observation simultaneously at 0.5 sigma or better: the Bullet Cluster collisionless fraction (0.18 sigma), the DESI dark energy equation of state w_0 = -0.838 (0.18 sigma), the Hubble tension ratio (0.3 sigma), the primordial spectral index n_s = 1 - 2/61 (0.55 sigma), and the GPS atomic clock drift (0.26%). All predictions were made before the corresponding observations; none are fits. EIGHT-CHANNEL OVER-DETERMINATION The central structural conjecture Ti_0 = Phi_4 - 1 is measured by eight independent physical procedures converging to 1% spread. Four of these channels (pure algebra, DESI supernovae, laboratory Stefan-Boltzmann from 1879, and cosmic age from stellar populations) bypass both the distance ladder and the CMB pipeline entirely, precluding the "circular calibration" critique. PARAMETER ECONOMY 4DCU operates on approximately two free parameters (Ti_0 and the baryon density Omega_b) plus one structural conjecture, against the twenty-six free parameters of LambdaCDM combined with the Standard Model. No dark matter particle is introduced; galaxy rotation curves (175 SPARC galaxies) and the Bullet Cluster are sourced by the Ti-gradient mechanism. No fine-tuning of the vacuum energy; the 10^120 cosmological constant problem reduces to a factor ~1.1. No postulated spatial flatness; the S^3 spatial slice is closed (K > 0). TESTABLE FALSIFICATION PATHS The framework makes specific, zero-parameter predictions for upcoming observations: redshift drift dot-z(z) measurable by ELT/ANDES, evolving w(z) from DESI DR3+, sub-solar-mass black hole mergers at LVK O4/O5, G(z*)/G_0 from a 4DCU-consistent Boltzmann pipeline (distinguishing 1.150 from 1.162 at 1% precision), and the K-ladder fractal universality across cosmic epochs. RELATION TO ESTABLISHED FRAMEWORKS 4DCU sits within the scalar-tensor (Brans-Dicke / Horndeski) family of modified gravity theories, with the scalar field Ti = 1/gamma identified from Special Relativity and additional discrete algebraic structure from H_4. The speed of light emerges as a theorem rather than a postulate; Lorentz invariance is derived as the tangent-space linearization of SO(4) rotations on S^3. STATUS AND SCOPE Skeleton 42 is the final framework iteration. Further work proceeds as topical papers extracted from this document, each targeting a specific result (Monument 14, K-ladder, Occam ledger, SPARC rotation curves) for specialist review. Three working frontiers (WF3.1, 3.2, 3.3) remain open, ranked by maturity; their closure would convert additional Planck-measured parameters into parameter-free structural predictions. Feedback from specialists in cosmology, modified gravity, Coxeter group representation theory, and mathematical physics is actively sought. Author: Miroslav Ivanov YosifovIndependent Researcher, Plovdiv, BulgariaORCID: 0009-0007-1842-656XContact: YosifovSpace@gmail.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miroslav Yosifov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: