Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis explores the evolution of final diphthongs in Latin case-forms, suggesting distinct linguistic patterns.
F. Sommer, in the revised edition of his Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre, offers no explanation of the development of final -āi in the dative singular of ā -stems (= first declension) to -ae rather than to ī ; see pp. 146, 327–28. Yet the development of the long diphthong āi to ī in non-initial (= unaccented) syllables is certain in the dative-ablative plural of ā -stems, and an identical development of the long ōi is seen in the same forms of the o -stems, where length is assured by the Sanskrit form: inst. pl. devāis = Latin dīvīs. The long diphthong in the dative singular of ā -stems is proved by the Greek ending in ‘terrae,’ ‘deae.'
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roland G. Kent (1925) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: