Key result
Maintenance SPACE for COPD© was perceived as an acceptable self-management intervention by 17 patients and 8 facilitators, helping patients adopt new exercise habits when personalized to their home lives.
Why the study?
Pulmonary rehabilitation benefits often decline after completion and maintenance is recommended to extend them, but detail is lacking on what maintenance should entail.
SPACE for COPD© is an acceptable maintenance strategy following pulmonary rehabilitation that can be personalized to support ongoing exercise habits.
Suggests light-touch self-management may support post-rehabilitation maintenance; leaves.
Introduction: Following completion of Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR), the biopsychosocial benefits often decline. PR maintenance is recommended to extend the benefits; however, detail lacks on what this should entail. SPACE for COPD© is a light touch, evidenced-based self-management intervention which we tested as a maintenance strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored the acceptability of SPACE for COPD© as a maintenance option following PR for both patients and facilitators using qualitative research methods. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients and intervention facilitators involved in the SPACE for COPD© maintenance study. These were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework Analysis. Results: Seventeen patients were interviewed; 13 (76.5%) of which were programme completers: five (29.4%) received a group-based intervention, four (23.5%) received one-to-one, and eight (47.1%) received hybrid. Two focus groups were conducted with eight facilitators; six (75%) were physiotherapists, one (12.5%) was a nurse, and one (12.5%) was a health psychologist. Analysis generated six themes: (1) the changing structure of maintenance SPACE for COPD©; (2) the integral role of the facilitator; (3) engagement with the manual required time and commitment from patients; (4) staying active on maintenance SPACE for COPD© was facilitated by goal setting and exercise; (5) biopsychosocial outcomes of maintenance SPACE for COPD©; and (6) the future of maintenance SPACE for COPD©. Conclusion: Maintenance SPACE for COPD© was acceptable and could be implemented into the PR healthcare pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic. It helped patients to adopt and integrate new exercise habits if they could adapt and personalise these to their home lives. Adaptions made during the COVID-19 pandemic created a menu of options. Building upon this personalisation is required to ensure the intervention is accessible and patient-centred.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barradell et al. (2026) studied Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (n=25). SPACE for COPD© was evaluated on Perceived acceptability of SPACE for COPD© as a maintenance option. Maintenance SPACE for COPD© was perceived as an acceptable self-management intervention by 17 patients and 8 facilitators, helping patients adopt new exercise habits when personalized to their home lives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: