Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study validates CGS criteria predicting outcomes in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, suggesting improved risk stratification.
The new Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) was recently updated by the International Myeloma Society and International Myeloma Working Group. We performed a retrospective study to validate the revised HRMM criteria in relapsed and refractory MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T. A total of 158 patients were included, of whom 75 (47%) met criteria for HRMM. The median follow-up was 24.8 months (95% CI 22.5–30.3). On multivariable analysis, patients with HRMM had significantly shorter PFS (HR 1.89, p = 0.003) and OS (HR 3.06, p < 0.001) compared to standard-risk MM (SRMM) following BCMA CAR-T. LDH > 210 U/L and EMD were also identified as independent adverse risk factors. Based on survival analyses, we constructed a reclassified staging system incorporating LDH and EMD into the CGS-HRMM criteria. Patients were divided into four discrete risk groups: low risk (SRMM with normal LDH and no EMD; n = 42, 26%), intermediate-low risk (HRMM with normal LDH and no EMD; n = 31, 20%), intermediate-high risk (SRMM with high LDH, EMD, or both; n = 41, 26%), and high risk (HRMM with high LDH, EMD, or both; n = 44, 28%). Patients with low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk disease had a median PFS of 35.0, 19.6, 10.4, and 6.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001), and an estimated 24-month OS of 90%, 69%, 66%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In summary, we validated the new CGS-HRMM criteria in relapsed and refractory MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T. We also propose a reclassified staging system to further improve risk stratification in MM patients treated with BCMA CAR-T.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: