Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis uncovers linguistic connections in Hittite, implying deeper Indo-European relationships.
I have tried to show (L anguage 3. 109–22) that Hittite h occurs where the Indo-European languages have bh initial, and I can now make two or three additions to the material there presented. In L anguage 4. 122 f. I have connected halanta ‘head’ with Greek φαλός·λευκός, φαλακρός ‘bald’, and Sanskrit bhālam ‘forehead’, on the assumption that the original meaning of the Hittite word was ‘bald’. Hittite haš-, hašh - ‘open’, must be identified with IE *bhosos ‘naked’, whence Lithuanian bãsas ‘bare-foot’, Old English bær , etc. The verb pihiš -, which, accompanied by the adverb arha , means ‘strike off, cut off, take off’ or the like, contains the verbal prefix pe -, while hiš - is an extension in s of the root which appears in IE *bhei - ‘strike’ (Old High German bīhal ‘axe’, etc.), and whose extended form *bheid - means ‘split’ (Sanskrit bhinadmi , Latin findo , etc). Another instance of h = bh after the verbal prefix pe - is pehar(k) - ‘hold towards’ ( Keilschrifttexte aus Boghazköi 4. 2. 2. 25, Keilschrift-Urkunden aus Boghazköi 13. 4. 4. 37) beside har ( k )- ‘have’ on which see L anguage 3. 117 f.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. H. Sturtevant (1928) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: