Cross-sectional study evaluates AI segmentation of teeth in CBCT for surgical splints, indicating feasibility for fabrication.
This cross-sectional study explored the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tooth segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for surgical splint fabrication. Digitized plaster models (0.2 mm offset) served as the reference, while AI-segmented CBCT dental arches adopted offsets of 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.75 mm. All splints were 3D-printed and evaluated for obstruction, stability, and interfacial space (N = 15). The 0.2 mm 3D-scan splints (median 3, interquartile range (IQR) 2-3) achieved better obstruction performance than CBCT 0.25 mm counterparts (median 2, IQR 1-3, P = 0.048), with no significant differences versus CBCT 0.5 mm (median 3, IQR 3-3; P = 0.20) and 0.75 mm groups(median 3, IQR 3-3, P = 0.32). In the stability test, there was no significant difference between 3D scan 0.2 mm (median 3, IQR 2-4), CBCT 0.25 mm (median 2, IQR 1-3), CBCT 0.5 mm (median 3, IQR 3-3), and CBCT 0.75 mm (median 3, IQR 2-3). 2D and 3D interfacial space analyses revealed that 3D scan 0.2 mm splints had significantly smaller gaps (P < 0.001) than splints from AI segmentation. Collectively, AI-powered CBCT tooth segmentation with 0.5 mm and 0.75 mm offsets enables surgical splint design with acceptable performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: