Essay explores the typewriter's role in shaping Fanon's work through the voices of his typists, indicating feminist implications.
This essay examines the central role of the typewriter in materializing Frantz Fanon's entire body of writing. Indeed, two typists—Josie Fanon and Marie-Jeanne Manuellan—painstakingly took dictation from Fanon to give his thoughts a physical shape. Examining accounts both fictional and non-fictional, I argue that the typewriter-woman is the medium of Fanon's revolutionary thought: she not only performs the reproductive labor of writing, but also actively shapes and constrains what Fanon said, thus contributing her voice to his famous works. By the same token, I insist on moving away from Fanon's words to those of his typist. Analyzing Manuellan's memoir as well as Josie Fanon's extraordinary career as an Algerian journalist, this article re-assesses the feminist stakes of reading Fanon. In particular, Josie Fanon's decolonial feminism provides a new way to contend with, if not repair, the violent misogyny associated with the "Fanon" name.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akrish Adhikari (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: