Observational analysis examines underweight's impact on dementia risk in older adults, suggesting significant implications for health management.
BackgroundUnderweight, defined as a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2, has been associated with increased risk of dementia in older adults. However, whether this association reflects a causal relationship remains unclear.ObjectiveTo examine the association between low BMI and dementia, independent of brain magnetic resonance imaging findings.MethodsWe analyzed data from patients aged ≥ 65 years with vascular risk factors enrolled in a Japanese observational registry. Patients were categorized by BMI as underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m²), or overweight (≥25.0 kg/m²). The outcomes were all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia.ResultsA total of 607 patients (median age, 74 years) were included: 58 underweight, 389 normal weight, and 160 overweight. During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 39 patients developed dementia and 30 developed AD dementia. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that underweight group had a significantly higher incidence of all-cause dementia (p = 0.002) and AD dementia (p = 0.009) compared with the other groups. Cox regression hazard analysis adjusted for age and sex revealed that underweight had a higher risk of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio, 3.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-7.67) compared with normal weight. In exploratory analysis, the association between underweight and all-cause dementia remained significant after adjustment for additional confounders, medial temporal atrophy, and white matter hyperintensities.ConclusionsUnderweight in older adults was associated with increased risk of all-cause dementia independent of age, sex, confounding factors, brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities. These findings warrant confirmation in larger cohorts.Clinical Trial RegistrationUMIN000026671.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitagawa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: