Key result
Different ART regimens show no difference in incident hypertension risk among adults with HIV.
Why the study?
Does the choice of antiretroviral therapy regimen affect the rate of incident hypertension in adults with HIV?
Cohort (n=4,662)
Does the choice of antiretroviral therapy regimen affect the rate of incident hypertension in adults with HIV?
The choice of antiretroviral therapy class or specific agent combination does not significantly impact the risk of incident hypertension in adults with HIV.
Purpose of the researchTo compare incident hypertension rates across antiretroviral therapy regimens among adults with HIV in routine clinical care in the US-based OPERA cohort.Major findingsThe hypertension incidence rate was 4.16 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 3.75, 4.61) among 3220 ART-naïve individuals, and 4.60 (95% CI: 3.99, 5.30) among 1442 ART-experienced individuals. There was no statistically significant difference in incident hypertension between regimens at the class-level (integrase inhibitor with/without tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), boosted protease inhibitor, and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) nor the drug-level (dolutegravir three-drug regimen with/without TAF, dolutegravir/lamivudine, bictegravir/emtricitabine/TAF, and boosted darunavir with TAF three-drug regimen).ConclusionsIn this large cohort representing routine clinical care in the USA, classes of antiretrovirals and specific agent combinations with or without TAF were not statistically significantly associated with incident hypertension. Other factors are likely to be more important drivers of hypertension than antiretroviral therapy selection in people with HIV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jr et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in HIV (n=4,662). Antiretroviral therapy regimens vs. Alternative antiretroviral therapy regimens was evaluated on Incident hypertension. Antiretroviral therapy regimens showed no significant differences in incident hypertension among adults with HIV (rates: 4.16 and 4.60 per 100 person-years in ART-naïve and ART-experienced groups).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: