PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation in the Digitalization Implementation in the Sport Injury Therapy Service in Special Region of Yogyakarta

View Full Paper
PSPerdana SatyaYogyakarta State UniversityDHDelano Enggista HendrikoYogyakarta State UniversityNANugroho Wahyu AjiYogyakarta State University

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of digitalization in sports injury therapy services using the CIPP model.
  • Employs the CIPP assessment model
  • Participants include owners, managers, therapists, and patients
  • Data collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation
  • Digitalization assessment score is 3.10, categorized as good.
  • Context evaluation rated at 3.01 (good), input at 3.06 (satisfactory), process at 2.20 (adequate), and product at 2.42 (adequate).
  • Some clinics have adopted digitalization effectively, while others have not.

Abstract

Abstract : This research aims to assess the outcomes of evaluating the context, input, process, and product of digitalization in sports injury therapy services in Special Region of Yogyakarta. This research employs the CIPP assessment model. The research participants included owners, managers, therapists, and patients at clinics in Special Region of Yogyakarta. The sampling method employed purposive sampling, with the criterion being the willingness to participate and complete questionnaires provided by the researchers. The data collection approaches included observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation procedures. This research included descriptive quantitative and descriptive qualitative analysis methodologies for data analysis. The success criterion employed intervals: 3.26-4.00 (Very Good), 2.51-3.25 (Good), 1.76-2.50 (Poor), and 1.75-1.00 (Very Poor). The findings indicate that the assessment of digitalization in sports injury therapy services in Special Region of Yogyakarta is at 3.10, categorized as good. The results derived from each evaluative component are as follows. Subsequently, each evaluative criterion is elucidated, specifically: The evaluation context of digitization in sports injury therapy services in Special Region of Yogyakarta is rated at 3.01, categorizing it as good. The input evaluation of digitalization in sports injury therapy services in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) is at 3.06, classified as satisfactory. The process evaluation of digitalization in sports injury therapy services in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) obtains a score of 2.20, classified as adequate. The assessment of digitalization in sports injury therapy services in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) obtains a score of 2.42, classified as adequate. The results indicate that, on average, each sports injury therapy clinic has adopted digitalization, albeit some have not executed it effectively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Satya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5a8888ba6daa22dac1a8https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19705290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing Digital Maturity in Healthcare: A Case Study of Jember Klinik Hospital, Indonesia2025
  2. 2Evaluation of Healthcare Service Digitalization Using the HOT-Fit Method2025
  3. 3Exploring the Digital Frontier in Sports Training: Coach's Perspectives, Influential Factors, and Case Study in Indonesia2024
  4. 4Evaluation of The Sports Coaching Program in South Sulawesi: an Evaluative Research CIPP Model Program2024
  5. 5Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model Evaluation of the Sports, Health and Physical Education Learning Program at Senior High School 1 Tanjungpandan, Indonesia2024