Natural resource management and area-based conservation are increasingly recognised as outcomes of complex interactions between ecological conditions and social systems, shaped by local knowledge, governance arrangements, and environmental pressures. The Social-Ecological Systems Framework (SESF), developed by Elinor Ostrom, provides a comprehensive framework to analyse these dynamics; however, most applications remain context-specific, limiting cross-site comparability. This study introduces the Conservation and Human Use Index (CHUI), a standardised diagnostic tool that operationalizes SESF principles for comparative analysis across conservation-important areas. CHUI comprises 134 qualitative questions structured across four equally weighted dimensions: (i) Natural Values and Ecosystem Services, (ii) Threats and Pressures, (iii) Governance, and (iv) Social Perceptions. Using an ordinal 0–3 scale with a “Not Applicable” option, the Index enables consistent, flexible application through both desk-based assessments and participatory processes. It generates aggregate and disaggregated outputs that help identify pressure hotspots, governance gaps, and conservation-use synergies. CHUI’s primary innovation lies in translating SESF into a pragmatic and participatory instrument that supports real-world decision-making. Rather than replacing detailed ecological or socio-economic assessments, it functions as a collaborative diagnostic compass to guide targeted investigation and intervention. Its participatory design fosters shared learning, transparency, and co-production of context-specific management pathways, supporting adaptive stewardship and community empowerment. Developed within the Horizon Europe PRO-COAST project and tested across ten European coastal case studies, CHUI advances both the operationalization of SESF and the practice of inclusive, adaptive conservation management.
Vayanou et al. (Thu,) studied this question.