Randomized trial evaluates rehabilitation effects on quality of life in FAI syndrome, suggesting improved outcomes despite limited functional change.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a three-month post-hip arthroscopy rehabilitation program within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing hip arthroscopy to sham surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome (HIPARTI trial) by describing: exercise adherence, type and pain; six-month changes in international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33); physical impairments and functional performance. DESIGN: Exploratory cohort study nested in a pilot RCT. METHODS: Participants aged 18-50 years with FAI syndrome completed a three-month, physiotherapist-led, post-surgical rehabilitation program, self-reporting rehabilitation adherence and pain levels on the Visual Analogue Scale using weekly training diaries. Baseline to six-month changes in quality-of-life (iHOT-33), physical impairment (hip strength, range of motion [ROM]) and functional performance (single-leg hop, side bridge endurance) were reported as mean (SD). RESULTS: Twenty-nine people (37% female; 29.9 ± 7.9 years) participated. Hip extension, abduction and functional exercises were performed most often. Exercise adherence analysis was limited by underreporting. Training diary data adequate to assess adherence were available for 20 participants (69%). Among those with available data,16 (80%) met the predefined adherence target of ≥2 sessions per week, average pain remained acceptable (<2 VAS); iHOT-33 (+18.6 ± 22.5; 95% CI: 10.2 to 27.0) and hip flexion ROM (+6°; 95% CI: 2.14 to 9.60) improved significantly. Hip extension, adduction, external-and-internal rotation strength improvements exceeded the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC), though were not significant. CONCLUSION: Adherence was generally high among participants with available data, though limited by underreporting. Hip-related quality of life (iHOT-33) improved despite limited changes in physical impairments, and no improvement in functional performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hibbert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: