Randomized trial evaluates saline sealing effectiveness in reducing pneumothorax incidence during lung biopsy, suggesting broader adoption.
The aim of the study is to evaluate effectiveness of normal saline tract sealing in reducing pneumothorax incidence during CT-guided lung biopsy compared with no specific intervention. A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted with 148 patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy, randomized into two groups: saline sealing (Group A, n = 75) and no sealing (Group B, n = 73). All procedures were performed by an experienced radiologist using standardized protocol. Normal saline (4 mL) was instilled into needle tract during withdrawal in Group A, while Group B underwent standard needle withdrawal without any intervention. The primary outcome was incidence of pneumothorax, assessed on post-procedure CT. Risk factors for pneumothorax were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Incidence of pneumothorax was lower in saline group (12.0%) compared with the no-saline group (24.7%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.075). No patients in either group required chest tube drainage. Multivariate analysis identified saline sealing as significant protective factor (OR = 0.298, 95% CI: 0.104–0.853, p = 0.024). Procedural factors, including lateral needle puncture (OR = 8.664, 95% CI: 1.469–51.098, p = 0.017) and four pleural punctures (OR = 10.785, 95% CI: 1.119–103.951, p = 0.040), were associated with increased pneumothorax risk. Normal saline tract sealing effectively reduces pneumothorax risk in CT-guided lung biopsy and is simple and cost-effective. These findings support its broader adoption, with further multicenter studies recommended to validate results and optimize technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: