Cross-sectional study tests how writing strategies influence well-being through motivation and flexibility.
Writing places substantial self-regulatory, motivational, and cognitive demands on adolescents, yet less is known about how self-regulation-based writing strategies (SRWS) are associated with academic well-being (AWB) and through which proximal resources this association may operate. This cross-sectional study tested a gender-moderated serial mediation model in 658 Grade 7–8 students (334 girls) from socio-economically diverse schools. Bayesian structural equation modelling with Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation was used, and parameters were interpreted using 95% credibility intervals. SRWS was positively associated with writing motivation (SRWS → WM, β = 0.57) and cognitive flexibility (SRWS → CF, β = 0.49), and writing motivation was positively associated with cognitive flexibility (WM → CF, β = 0.21). Academic well-being was positively associated with cognitive flexibility (CF → AWB, β = 0.34) and SRWS (SRWS → AWB, β = 0.34), whereas the unique WM → AWB path was not credibly different from zero. The indirect effects SRWS → CF → AWB and SRWS → WM → CF → AWB were credible in both gender groups. A small negative SRWS × gender interaction in the AWB equation indicated that the SRWS–AWB association was weaker for boys than for girls. The model explained 36% of the variance in writing motivation, 37% in cognitive flexibility, and 31% in academic well-being. Overall, the findings are consistent with the view that SRWS is linked to academic well-being primarily through cognitive flexibility, with writing motivation contributing indirectly through its positive association with cognitive flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serkan Aslan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: