Identifies food-based dietary patterns associated with depression in Korean adults, suggesting new public health strategies.
Background/Objectives: Dietary patterns may influence depression, yet findings remain inconsistent, partly due to methodological variation in dietary pattern identification. As data-driven approaches may help reduce subjectivity and improve reproducibility in dietary pattern identification, this study aimed to identify dietary patterns using a machine learning approach and examine their associations with depression among Korean adults. Methods: Using data from 21,321 Korean adults aged 19–64 years from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016–2021), we applied K-means clustering to identify dietary patterns based on both food group and nutrient intake. Dietary intake was assessed using a 24 h dietary recall, and depression status was based on physician diagnosis. Results: Three distinct patterns were identified in both food group-based and nutrient-based analyses. In the food group-based analysis, a balanced and diverse dietary pattern (Cluster 3) was associated with lower odds of depression compared with a pattern characterized by overall low food intake (Cluster 1) (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47–0.88; p = 0.007) after full adjustment, whereas no significant association was observed for the high processed food pattern (Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 1) (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53–1.01). No significant associations were observed for nutrient-based clusters after full adjustment. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that adherence to balanced and diverse dietary patterns based on whole foods is associated with lower odds of depression. Food group-based clustering approaches may offer more reproducible and interpretable insights than nutrient-based approaches, supporting their potential utility in epidemiological research and public health strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: